The 5.(F)/123’s “ideal” machine seems to have been a Bf 109 G-5/AS with just a single MG 151/20 cannon, MW 50 and an Rb 50/30 camera (offering good results at 6000 m or more). The Staffel appears to have been rebuilding since 30 March, when it had consisted of:
5 Bf 109 G-4, 2 Bf 109 G-5, 2 Bf 109 G-6 and 2 Fw 190 A-5
1 Bf 108 and 1 Fi 156 (communications aircraft)
At that point, four of the Bf 109s and one Fw 190 had been absent or unserviceable while only three pilots had been ready for operations (one was conditionally ready, one on leave and seven detached).
The 4. Staffel seemingly had many more G-6 sub-types, similarly equipped, but both units ended up flying a mixture and it appears that they were phasing out their Bf 109 G-4s during the Spring.
There were a few Fw 190s distributed throughout NAG 13 and FAG 123 but no definite reports (in the sources I have so far consulted) of their being used over the Channel or British Isles during this period although they had flown frequently in March. The 4.(F)/123 gave up its last two in April while the 5. Staffel had some on strength until August. Over the Summer NAG 13 seems progressively to have concentrated its Focke-Wulfs into its 2. Staffel while withdrawing that unit’s Bf 109s.
On the quality of German photography, S/L David Linton of the Allied Central Interpretation Unit at RAF Medmenham had this to say, based on captured examples:
So let us look now at what the German units actually did.
Intelligence officers on the Allied side naturally interested themselves in what the Luftwaffe might be able to discover of Allied preparations for a cross-Channel invasion. Throughout the winter of 1943–44 they concluded that “no recce was being flown”, noting how Ob. West’s situation reports always included the formula “PR and visual recce provided no new information.” A successful photo-reconnaissance of Chatham Dockyard was carried out on 15 February, the German Naval Staff concluding that evaluation of the results had indicated nothing unusual. The diary of the Seekriegsleitung (Naval High Command) for 24 February includes the following:
Photo-reconnaissance of Portsmouth, Yarmouth and Cowes was carried out at midday. Visual observation of motor torpedo boat activity in the Solent. Five quite large vessels were lying off Cowes. On the west side of the Iisle of Wight there was probably a fairly large net barrier.
Photo-reconnaissance of London at [0700 GMT] on 21/2 from 1000 m altitude revealed in the Thames Estuary: 36 freighters, 2 T [tankers], 1 escort vessel, 7 picket boats and 2 apparent LCT outward bound from the Estuary; 1 paddle steamer and 15 fishing vessels inbound.
In the bend of the Thames at Erith: 1 LCT, around 60 auxiliary landing craft, 1 T, 1 freighter, 5 apparent auxiliary landing ships.
In the Thames bend at Woolwich about 60 apparent auxiliary landing craft.
In the King George Dock: 1 battleship of the King George V class.
On the 25th, two Fw 190 from Lannion (attributed by the British to NAG 13) were plotted 40 km east of the Lizard at 12.15. Flying NW at 4000 m they crossed the coast near Falmouth seven minutes later and was reported to have dropped a bomb, which failed to explode, at Penhale on the outskirts of Helston. These aircraft also made three reports of shipping in the Channel. On 20 March the Kriegsmarine recorded that ph0to-reconnaissance of the southwestern point of the Cornish peninsula had revealed surprisingly meagre occupation of Penzance, Newlyn and Salcombe by smaller-capacity vessels: only two LCT 250, 22 auxiliary landing-craft and 22 Schuten (a type of barge) were pictured.
More productive was photography of Falmouth reported on the 23rd, showing a destroyer, nine LST, 21 large landing boats, four auxiliary landing craft, 3 freighters and 15 harbour and coastal vessels.
continued on next page …